Controls of methane emissions from different types of vegetation patches within a wetland

Poster 178

Gil Bohrer

Ohio State University

Co-Authors: Jorge Villa, Yang Ju, Justin Missik, Kelly Wrighton

In the global context, wetlands are small. However, wetlands are responsible for a very large fraction of the global methane flux, the second most effective greenhouse gas. Current modeling efforts and global upscaling of observations of wetland methane fluxes assume a single wetland as the atomic scale of their resolution. Observations are averaged to represent the whole wetland where they were taken, and applied to other wetlands of a similar type and climate, ignoring within-wetland heterogeneity of hydrology and ecology. However, wetlands are typically highly heterogeneous, and observations showed large differences in flux rates from different vegetation patches within the same wetlands. We used multi-scale observations approach, combining eddy covariance, and surface and leaf chamber observations of methane fluxes, and vertically detailed pore water concentrations of dissolved methane and genetic characterization of the microbiomes, in Old Woman Creek, an estuarine, mineral soil wetland in Ohio. The wetland where we work has extremely high methane fluxes, but it is not untypical for wetlands in agricultural watersheds in the Midwest. We demonstrate that any sampling of methane fluxes in a wetland must account for the areas of the eco-hydrological patch types that each of the samples within the wetland represent. We provide process-level observations of the parameters and dynamics that govern methane production and emission at the patch level. We show different patterns of regulation of methane transport through plants, and provide direct observations of the bulk conductivity of different vegetation types at different times through the season. The parameters and processes we observe could be incorporated in land-surface models that simulate wetlands

Post comments and questions for author below.

All posts are publicly visible after review by site administrator. Students’ responses to posted questions is factored into scoring for the poster competition. Finalists announced May 25 and awards presented May 26, 2021.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: